I experienced an extremely unsettling few minutes this morning as I perused the Internet for hot topics relating to pregnancy....
I experienced an extremely unsettling few minutes this morning as I perused the Internet for hot topics relating to pregnancy. The reason? I came across several articles and blog posts telling the story of a couple who is trying to decide whether they should have an abortion. Instead of making such an extremely serious and personal decision themselves, they have decided to ask the internet if they should have an abortion. Yes, you read that right. They are polling the 'net to determine whether they should have an abortion or keep their pregnancy. First, I want to be clear. I'm not writing about this to have the pro-life vs. pro-choice debate. That never goes well...and there's no point. Plus, our personal feelings on abortion are not at issue here. The issue is that a couple is taking a very, very personal and extremely serious decision -- because no matter how you feel about abortion, the decision to have one is unarguably serious -- and asking strangers to make it for them. The couple, Pete and Alisha Arnold, created a website -- Birth or Not -- with the tag line "Help us decide. A real abortion vote." On the sidebar is the following:
Dec. 9th is the last day we could legally get an abortion in our state. This vote will remain open until 2 days prior to allow for the procedure if decided.
And below that is a poll. An actual Polldaddy poll. The question: "Should We Give Birth or Have an Abortion?" The options: "Have an abortion" or "Give birth." Take a minute, if you need one. I did. Their website has the traditional "About" page where you learn a bit about Pete and Alisha. They seem quite normal, really. Which probably shouldn't surprise me, but it does, because I don't think there's anything normal about asking millions of random strangers to decide whether you should have an abortion. Gawker interviewed Pete over the phone and shared this:
Pete told us over the phone that on that day he plans to check Polldaddy's records to make sure there hasn't been any double-voting or other evidence of fraud and then he and Alisha will use the results to decide whether to keep the baby. They'll have two days to make a decision before the 20th week of Alisha's pregnancy ends, and, with it, her last chance to get an abortion. The poll will influence their decision heavily, the couple said by phone this evening, but it won't be binding. "It's kind of like Congress. They might vote for something, but the president has the final veto. If it's overwhelming one way or the other, that will carry a lot more weight."
Well, phew. That's great news. I mean, we wouldn't want any double voters. And at least strangers' input into whether they should have an abortion isn't binding on them. I feel better now. Or not. I'm hopeful that this is a prank, even though Pete Arnold assured Gawker that asking millions of people via the internet whether he and his wife should have an abortion was not a prank. There's more to this story. Pete and Alisha Arnold have experienced two miscarriages over the past year and half. They bought their domain name during the last pregnancy...before they miscarried. Which means they were thinking about doing this before they became pregnant this time. And that, of course, makes me ask: Why did they get pregnant again? According to Gawker,
Pete, who described himself as a Libertarian, framed the couple's majority-rule abortion as kind of an extreme civics lesson that he hoped would bring the abortion debate home. "Voting is such an important part of who we are as a people," Pete said. "Here's a chance where people can be heard about whether they are pro-choice or whether they are pro-life, and it makes a difference in the real world."
Wow. Gawker did a nice job explaining the extreme logical flaws in that argument. No point in getting into that. Because, really, is a couple who intentionally gets pregnant, not knowing whether they want to be parents, then asks the public whether they should have an abortion, logical? Whether this is an awful prank, a pro-life stunt or the absolute truth, Gawker pretty much summed it up:
...all of these possibilities suggest these people should never, ever raise a kid.
I'm bothered by this. I know that insane things play out on the internet all the time. But simply because the internet is full of crazy doesn't mean it doesn't bother me occasionally. I find the situation sad if it's true...and I find these people sad if it's not. So, what do YOU think? What's your reaction? Do you think it's true? False? Do you care?

recommended for you

Comments

andyjnj November 15, 2014
锘縰nmen on the Black June corporation acquired broken into a Olympic Village. There some people gripped 11 Israeli sportsmen, motor coachs together with representatives of their rentals.

A couple of the hostages ended up being slain while in the primary instances. By the end of the day, your being unfaithful many other Israeli hostages and everything nevertheless several with the gunmen will be inactive. Your discolor of the particular horrible day would probably continue to be for decades on the payday loan lenders Munich, in In german administrators additionally, on the Olympic movement's leadership, which in turn attempted to understate a loss. Military services. We all decided to go in any event. There was earned low cost seats for any basketball coordinate in the lottery game intended for American soldiers together with intended to attend by using a couple of many other couples.

There were virtually no story which will occasions will be canceled. For a lieutenant I used to be making fewer than $500 per month, and that we just didn't want to spend the expense of check in, also at discount prices.

As we arrived, choosing one sounded a wise just one. Despite the pressure surrounding the creating the place that the hostages appeared to be placed, otherwise details seemed really common. On the Olympic Park, there were hardly any safety check points, not any seems connected with fearfulness or stress among the masses and no a sense security besides across the athletes' groups. And others were against the rules to help visitors anyway.

Some peace officer ambled on the list of throngs. However , there have been no signs of extra security and safety <a href=http://rhand.org.tt/Uploads/nike/nike23526.html>nike free 3.0 v5 mens blue</a>that will these days, within the submit 9/11 planet, will be standard along with predicted.

Within an period of time prior to the World-wide-web, well before touch screen phones plus prior to Round-the-clock reports menstrual cycles, there seemed to be modest worry via a flight. Not a soul was huddling spanning a radio station looking to abide by gatherings. The one hint of problems, as well heli along with provided police on the roof, was really a daring challenged subject at a The german language newspaper in which yelled: "Geiselnahme,Half inch or "Hostage Acquiring.In

However, for those that did not know German born, it had become nearly impossible to find an idea that something seemed to be completely wrong. That is the way the ceo in the Overseas Olympic Committee, Avery Brundage, wished it all. Because time approved without having any quality, a get together outside of the Olympic Whole village folded with.

Net




<a href=http://rhand.org.tt/Uploads/nike/nike23139.html>nike free run 2 new zealand</a>
<a href=http://www.vakantieplaats.nl/application/language/template2.php?moncler-quincy-moncler-dames-down-jassen-zwart-p-847.html>Moncler Quincy Moncler Dames Down Jassen Zwart Lage Prijs Verkoop Winkel 2014</a>
<a href=http://rhand.org.tt/Uploads/nike/nike17854.html>new nike air max 1 2014</a>
<a href=http://rhand.org.tt/Uploads/nike/nike15450.html>jual nike air max thea original</a>
<a href=http://rhand.org.tt/Uploads/nike/nike17535.html>nike air max lunar si prezzo</a>